The Fundamental Flaw with Membership Sites

by Jason on February 10, 2010

I was on the phone last night talking to a good friend of mine and he asked me about whether or not he should put effort into growing and expanding his paid membership site.

I said no.

You hear a lot of hype about membership sites and other clubs etc. that produce continuity income.

And most of the time you see an expert pushing his latest membership site silver bullet, they make it seem like a slam dunk business success.

I think continuity income is a great idea. Who wouldn’t like to have such a leveraged business model creating steady income without a huge amount of ongoing work?

But I think creating a membership site for your customers isn’t a smart long term strategy to grow your business.

In fact, I think there’s a fundamental flaw with content based membership sites.

Here’s part of the reason:

Consulting: How to Be a Fallen Angel

I’ve been consulting for quite a few years now. First in technology, then (once I got an inside look at businesses and realized I could add value) in marketing.

There’s a funny little thing that happens in consulting with a client if you aren’t prepared for it. Here’s how it generally goes:

1. Client retains your services.
2. Client is excited and tells you how great you are. Thinks you are the best thing since sliced bread. You don’t disagree :)
3. You begin to work with client.
4. Client is happy with your work and results.

And then it happens.

5. Inexperienced consultant decides to stick around and work even CLOSER with client.
6. BAM. All of a sudden, consultant seems oddly normal.

I have run this little loop more times than I care to admit. And that’s why these days, I know it’s smart to get in, add value and get out.

Because doing otherwise and expecting my business to grow is going face to face with the beast I call human nature.

The longer you stick around, the more normal you become, regardless of just how valuable your skills are.

So what does this have to do with membership sites?

Everything. In a membership site, you’re fighting the same beast.

Why Do Entrepreneurs Start Membership Sites Anyway?

I’m sure there are plenty of reasons business owners start a membership site. But in all the years I’ve been working online and consulting with clients, I pretty much only hear one reason:

To make a lot of money without doing so much work.

And that, I think is the real problem. Because it leaves out the only thing that will support a long and profitable business: happy customers.

Do your customers care about your goal for ever increasing profits with smaller and smaller amounts of work? Of course not.

Have you ever heard an entrepreneur say, “I’m going to start this membership site because my customers NEED this value delivered this way.”

I’m sure it’s happened, but probably not very often. I know I’ve never heard it.

If you’re reading this, chances are, you’ve subscribed to a few (or many) membership sites.

I have too.

Virtually everyone I’ve ever subscribed to has been cancelled pretty soon thereafter.

Why?

Because of my expectations. They aren’t rational, but they are real.

Here’s a chart of what happens to my expectations when I subscribe to a membership site. As time goes by… I expect more.

This isn’t something I’m thinking consciously really, it’s just a feeling that says, after a few months go by, “I’m not sure this is worth the money…”

So I cancel.

Leveraged Profits vs. Customer Happiness

If it’s natural for the unique to become normal over time… and it’s natural for customer expectations to rise over time… then the traditional membership site where you keep adding content and hope it’s enough to have your members stick around is not a stable way to build your business.

Because you’re fighting a losing battle in my opinion.

As a business owner, you want leveraged profits. More profits for less work over time.

The customer, of course, doesn’t care about you. They want more value for less money over time.

Or at least they want the same value for the same money over time. But for some reason, logging into a membership site and seeing the same content doesn’t translate into “I’m getting the same value for my money.” It usually seems like you’re getting less for your money…

I’m guilty of this myself. I created a membership site that’s still alive today. I don’t actively promote it any longer because I built it bass ackwards… I created a site where the member puts in work first for possible payoff later. Instead, I should have focused on creating a tool that delivers real value today. When I say real value I mean that they get some concrete value now. Not the stupid “this information is worth $10,000″ type of marketing crap you read all the time.

A Better Model for Continuity Income

I think a better model for generating continuity income is to create a tool that your customers actually need.

Think about an autoresponder service. I don’t expect their service to be all that different next month than it is this month.

Each month, I use it and I pay a fee. I just want it to work.

Why are my expectations different than they are if I subscribe to a content based membership site?

Because if I don’t read and use the content and produce a result that I like, then no value is delivered. I don’t care what the marketing copy says. If the customer says value isn’t delivered, then it isn’t delivered. Period.

Here’s another advantage to creating a tool that your customers actually want and need.

Tools can be created to become stickier over time. That means they become more valuable to your customers over time, not less valuable.

How many AWeber customers or 1Shoppingcart.com customers wouldn’t try another service provider if it wasn’t so difficult and clumsy to transfer information from one service to another?

But it’s just too much of a pain to really do it.

So what are your opinions about this? Do you run a successful membership site that’s been thriving for years? Why is it so successful?

Have you tried to create a membership site and had it flop? Or die a slow and painful death?

Leave your comment below, and thanks for stopping by.

No related posts.

  • http://www.BenSettle.com/ Ben Settle

    No membership site for me… but I am trying my hand at a print (offline — paper and ink) newsletter. We'll see how it goes… or if it's going to succumb to the same forces you described about membership sites

  • http://recessionsolution.wordpress.com/ scott aughtmon

    Jason – I really like your idea of creating tools instead. I think it's harder, but like you said, it makes you much more needed for the long haul. It reminds me of the story that's told about the 1849 “gold rush”. It was the people who sold the picks, plates, shovels, etc. (the tools) who made the real “guaranteed” money. Otherwise only a few got “lucky” and made it from panning gold. I think that's the same with membership sites. Maybe the key is to make the tools that membership site owners need! :)

  • leistermg

    Hey Ben,

    Thanks for your comment. Clearly there ARE a lot of recurring revenue models out there that ARE successful over time.

    Plenty of people still subscribe to magazines, after all. My hunch is that success is tied to setting your customers expectations well. Not over promising. Then over delivering. But I think it starts with NOT over promising.

    But I wonder what would happen if magazines sold monthly subscriptions vs. just paying upfront for a whole year? Surely they've tested that right? :)

  • http://www.dobermandan.com Doberman Dan

    At one time, I told Gary Halbert he should convert his website to a membership model. He said, “Why? I make a lot of money with it as it is… and I only write new newsletters when I feel like it.”

    Back then, membership sites were all the rage. Now… eh.

    You're the first guy I've seen to point this out in print.

    Ben Settle keeps bugging me to do an offline paper & ink newsletter… but I wonder if the reaction to that over time will be the same as you described for membership sites.

    Best,
    Dan

  • leistermg

    I think stuff that's going to last is definitely harder to create. And you probably (maybe) have to sift through a lot more failure before you get it right.

    In the end, I think it's about delivering a lot of REAL value first. Then making the money because of that, not in spite of it.

  • leistermg

    Dan,

    Thank you for taking the time to stop by. And for your comment.

    Maybe it's time to reinvent the marketing newsletter? It's been a long time since someone redefined what that means and the value it delivers and how it does that.

    Now that everyone can be a publisher, I think the game is changing. There's a lot more junk out there because it's easy to produce… even offline.

    Makes the good stuff harder to hear and notice.

    I don't know what the NEW marketing letter would look like, but I can't wait till somebody does it. I'll have my credit card ready :)

  • timschmidt

    Hey Jason,
    Your comments on the membership site model are right on the money. (And this is coming from a guy who owns a large membership site.) I also love the idea of creating a useful “tool” that has value to your members. This tool can be community, product reviews, etc. I think the biggest fallacy of “membership sites” is that if you create one you're on easy street. You MUST continually add value to your customers on a monthly basis… or they're gone.
    Again… great post.

  • http://andybeard.eu AndyBeard

    So far this is one of the reasons I haven't created my own membership site, and in fact also the reason I ended up leaving my last job 7 years ago

  • leistermg

    Hey Tim,

    Thanks for stopping by! Long time no speak :)

    Yeah, I think the “tool” business is a nice place to be… however you define tool.

  • http://www.johncamanley.com/ John C. A. Manley

    So far our stick rate has been pretty good at http://www.drcarolyndean.com/fhn (a health site). It's not tell-you-die membership program, though. Just 3 years. Finish line. Each week builds on the next. Made more sense to me. People start at grade 1 and work their way up to university. I'd rather no 80% will stay 3 years than 20% will stay 10. And we'd rather just make a 3 year program than improve it and add more value/content/tools and let even those who completed have access.

  • leistermg

    John,

    I think having a start and finish date like you do is one darn smart idea :)

    If I were the customer I'd feel completely differently about that. I'd KNOW there was an end.

    Probably doesn't sound logical, but I know that's how I'd feel.

  • http://www.johncamanley.com/ John C. A. Manley

    So far the refund rates are almost non-existent — so I think it's working. People have a goal and a finish line. It also allows us just to pack it full of great content without feeling like we need to save anything for later.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: